Legal Opinion
Einhorn v. Valley Medical Specialists, P.C.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 7, 1992No. 2 CA-CV 92-0037PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DRUKE, Judge.
The dispute before us questions an arbitrator’s authority to enter an award that was confirmed on review by the trial court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-2101.01(A)(6).
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Dr. Daniel Einhom was an employee/shareholder with three other physicians in Valley Medical Specialists, P.C. (VMS). Because of differences with the others, Einhom’s employment was terminated effective December 17, 1988. Disputes arose thereafter as to the amounts due Einhom for (a) his year-end bonus under the VMS employment agreement, (b) his stock in both VMS…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Smitty's Super-Valu, Inc. v. PasqualettiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Transnational Insurance Company v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Jeanes v. Arrow Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- New Pueblo Const., Inc. v. LAKE PATAGONIA REC. ASSOCIATION, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Cottonwood v. James L. Fann Contracting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Heinig v. HudmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Atreus Communities Group v. Stardust Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Hallmark Industries, L.L.C. v. First Systech International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Hallmark Industries v. First SystechCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.