Legal Opinion

City of Cottonwood v. James L. Fann Contracting, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 19, 1994No. 1 CA-CV 92-0111PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GERBER, Judge.

Appellant City of Cottonwood (Cottonwood) appeals from the trial court’s determination that appellee Fann Contracting (Fann) requested arbitration in a timely manner and the trial court’s order that the parties proceed to arbitration. Cottonwood also appeals the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees to Fann. We hold that the arbitrator is the proper party to consider the issue of timeliness, but because the arbitrator independently determined that Fann’s request was timely, the court did not err in sending the parties to arbitration. We further hold that the trial court…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In re the Arbitration between the County of Rockland & Primiano Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Local No. 1710, International Ass'n of Fire Fighters, AFL-CIO v. City of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  2. Dueñas v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Modular Mining System, Inc. v. Jigsaw Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. Coup v. Scottsdale Plaza Resort, LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2011
  5. Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API