Legal Opinion

New Pueblo Const., Inc. v. LAKE PATAGONIA REC. ASSOCIATION, INC.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 31, 1970No. 2 CA-CIV 781PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

On September 25, 1967 the appellee, hereinafter referred to as Lake Patagonia or the Owner, and the appellant, hereinafter referred to as New Pueblo or the Contractor, entered into a contract for the construction of a dam on Sonoita Creek in Santa Cruz County, Arizona.

Paragraph 26 of the contract provides in part as follows :

“ADJUSTMENT OF DISPUTE. All-questions or controversies which may arise between the Contractor and the Owner, under or in reference to this contract, shall be subject to the decision of some competent person to be agreed upon by the Owner and the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Robert Lawrence Company, Inc. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  3. In the Matter of James B. Carey, as President of International Union of Electrical Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  4. Bewick v. MechamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Hamberlin v. TownsendArizona Supreme Court · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Rancho Pescado, Inc. v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. Bel Pre Medical Center, Inc. v. Frederick Contractors, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. U.S. Insulation, Inc. v. Hilro Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  4. Dusold v. Porta-John Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. Exber, Inc. v. Sletten Construction CompanyNevada Supreme Court · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API