Legal Opinion

Martens v. Hall

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided September 30, 1977No. 77-8144-Civ-CFPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

FULTON, District Judge.

This cause came before the Court upon the motions of the defendants to dismiss and for a writ of prohibition.

Defendants style their first motion as an “Application for a Writ of Prohibition.” The statutory grant of power to federal courts to issue the writ of prohibition is found in 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a). The general purpose of this writ is to protect the court’s appellate jurisdiction. See Parr v. United States, 351 U.S. 513, 76 S.Ct. 912, 100 L.Ed. 1377 (1956). Thus, the writ petitioned for herein is incorrectly styled. The defendants, no doubt, seek to enjoin…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Kenosha v. BrunoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Parr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. United Farmworkers of Florida Housing Project, Inc. v. The City of Delray Beach, Florida, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. Thurston v. DekleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Raymond Muzquiz v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. B. J. B. A. v. M. J. B.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Gulf Homes, Inc. v. GonzalesArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Holland v. SteeleDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1981
  4. Mitchell v. Frank Morris Pontiac-Buick-GMC, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Courtney v. ButtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API