Legal Opinion
David Hover v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 14, 2013No. 13-895CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge.
On November 12, 2013, plaintiff in the above-captioned case, appearing pro se, filed a complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff, who is currently incarcerated in Colorado state prison, alleges that various federal courts, federal judges, and federal officials have violated his civil rights, and seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Specifically, he contends that these courts, judges, and officials have purposefully prevented the consideration of the merits of his claims regarding the conditions of his confinement, either by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Roynell Joshua v. The United States, on MotionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Gerald Alan Brown, and Charles v. Darnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stanwyck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Hicks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Coleman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Driessen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.