Legal Opinion

Williams v. Peacock

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 1983No. 83-265PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

441 So.2d 57 (1983)

Stuart L. WILLIAMS, et ux, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

Henry PEACOCK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 83-265.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

November 9, 1983.

Self & Burkett, Don M. Burkett, Many, for defendant-appellant.

Gahagan & Gahagan, Fred S. Gahagan, Natchitoches, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before FORET, STOKER and YELVERTON, JJ.

YELVERTON, Judge.

This is a boundary action and an action for damages for trespass to immovable property.

The Williamses brought these actions alleging the boundary line between the contiguous estates had been a fence which the defendant, Henry…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. William T. Burton Industries, Inc. v. WellmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  2. Wm. T. Burton Industries, Inc. v. McDonaldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. LeBlanc v. LabordeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Dubois v. RichardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Fontenot v. MarksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Broussard v. ColemanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Bowman v. BlankenshipLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Mistric v. KurtzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Naquin v. Air Engineered Systems & Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Schexneider v. VillejoinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API