Legal Opinion

Schexneider v. Villejoin

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 2, 1986No. 85-361PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNOLL, Judge.

Saule Schexneider (hereafter Schexneider) appeals the judgment of the trial court maintaining the defendant’s, Edes Ville-join’s (hereafter Villejoin), exception of 10 and 30 years acquisitive prescription of a disputed strip of land, and the establishment of the boundary line which gave Ville-join the entirety of the disputed property. The trial court concluded that it was the intention of the common ancestor in title of both Schexneider and Villejoin to set the boundary at the fence line, and that Ville-join maintained possession of the disputed area to the fence line in excess…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Waterman v. Tidewater Associated Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  2. Snelling v. AdairSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Sessum v. HemperleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  4. Dubois v. State Through Dept. of Pub. SafetyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. William T. Burton Industries, Inc. v. WellmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Harmon v. HarmonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Jody Stelly v. Joseph Roderick BergeronLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. Schexneider v. VillejoinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API