Legal Opinion

Mistric v. Kurtz

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 9, 1992No. 91-1235PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

610 So.2d 226 (1992)

Daniel S. MISTRIC, et ux., Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

Edna KURTZ, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 91-1235.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

December 9, 1992.

Writ Denied February 11, 1993.

Jacque B. Pucheu, Jr., Eunice, for plaintiffs-appellees.

James P. Doherty, Jr., Opelousas, for defendants-appellants.

Before GUIDRY, DOUCET and WOODARD, JJ.

GUIDRY, Judge.

This is a boundary action involving adjoining properties located in downtown Opelousas, Louisiana. Plaintiffs, Daniel S. Mistric and Margie P. Mistric, filed this suit in 1989 to establish the boundary between their…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. PeacockLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. McPherson v. RoyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Briggs v. PellerinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Williamson v. KellyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Seven Water Holes Corp. v. SpiresLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brooking v. VegasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Pace v. TownsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Merritt v. BrennanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Sagnibene v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Soileau v. MatteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API