Legal Opinion

Gold v. City of Kingston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Van Kirk, J.:

The action is brought to recover for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff on October 28, 1922, at five-thirty p. m., when the automobile in which he was riding struck against a housing which inclosed the water pipes of the city of Kingston, which pipes had been laid along the floor of the bridge which carried Albany avenue in the city of Kingston over the tracks of the Ulster and Delaware Railroad Company. The complaint charges liability upon the city of Kingston on the ground that it negligently constructed and maintained this housing. The charge against the defendants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Melker v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Forsyth v. . City of OswegoNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Rogers v. . Village of Port ChesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Johnson v. City of TroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Artukovich v. AstendorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Artukovich v. AstendorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API