Legal Opinion
Artukovich v. Astendorf
California Supreme Court
Decided December 3, 1942No. L. A. 18179Published
1Opinion of the Court
21 Cal.2d 329 (1942)
JERRY ARTUKOVICH, JR., a Minor, etc., Appellant,
v.
FRED O. ASTENDORF et al., Defendants; COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Respondent.
L. A. No. 18179.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
Dec. 3, 1942.
J. M. Sinclair and A. D. Orme for Appellant.
Jennings & Belcher, Stevens Fargo, J. H. O'Connor, County Counsel, and S. V. O. Prichard, Assistant County Counsel, for Respondents.
SPENCE, J. pro tem.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained defendants' demurrers to the complaint as amended without further leave to amend.
The complaint, which was…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Toucey v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Winter v. . City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- McDonald v. City of Spring ValleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
- Murphy v. . Village of Fort EdwardNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.