Legal Opinion · Dissent

Artukovich v. Astendorf

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1942No. L. A. 18179Published

1Dissent

CARTER, J.-

— I dissent. The majority opinion is based on a purely cold legalistic theory without regard to considerations of justice or the rights of those who because of disability are entitled to greater protection than the law extends to normal persons. The applicability of claim statutes to minors must necessarily lead to absurd results. A minor of tender years is not legally competent to commence a civil action or do anything affecting his property or legal rights. The requirement that a claim be filed presupposes a competent person as claimant: Section 4075 of the Political Code…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Winter v. . City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. McDonald v. City of Spring ValleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Murphy v. . Village of Fort EdwardNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. MacMullen v. . City of MiddletownNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Russo v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API