Legal Opinion

Turner v. Southeastern Grain & Livestock Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 21, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The judge found the facts, as he is required to do, and embodied them in the judgment. Smith v. Holmes, 148 N. C., 210. Upon the findings made, supported, as they are, by competent evidence, the motion was properly overruled. Bartholomew v. Parrish, ante, 151.

Not only did the judge find, upon ample evidence, that the appealing plaintiffs were duly represented by reputable and solvent counsel at the time of tbe entry of tbe judgment in question and that tbe same was taken tbrougb no mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect on their part or on tbe part of tbe appealing plaintiffs,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Norton v. . McLaurinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Gaster v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Smith v. Holmes Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Craver v. . SpaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Kerr v. North Carolina Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Crye v. . StoltzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Foster v. Allison Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Foster v. . Allison CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API