Legal Opinion
Bratta v. Caruso Car Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 31, 1958No. Civ. 23285PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATROSSO, J. pro tem. *
Plaintiffs appeal from an adverse judgment in an action instituted to rescind a conditional sales contract for the purchase of an automobile executed between the plaintiffs and defendant Caruso Car Company, Inc., which contract was subsequently assigned to the defend ant Commercial Credit Corporation. The sole question presented is whether the contract in question conforms to the requirements of section 2982 of the Civil Code.
On August 19,1956, appellants entered into a written agreement with respondent Caruso for the purchase of a used 1956 Plymouth automobile. As part…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re PalliserSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Commonwealth v. DowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- People v. QuielCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- State ex rel. Farmers Mutual Insurance v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Little Redhouse, Brady Tah, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. Quality Ford Sales, Inc., a Utah Corporation, and Thomas E. ReddCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Keyes v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Highway Trailer of California, Inc. v. FrankelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Commercial Credit Corp. v. Hull Chevrolet-Olds, Inc., New York County Courts1964
- Little Redhouse, Brady Tah, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. Quality Ford Sales, Inc., a Utah Corporation, and Thomas E. ReddCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.