State v. Crowner
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Louis Coxirt of Criminal Correction.
1Opinion of the CourtVories, Judge
The defendants in this case were prosecuted for living ¡«i a state of open and notorious adultery. The information upon which they were prosecuted charged : “That John D. Crowner and Nettie Gordon, as affiant believed, in St. Louis county, on the 1st day of May, 1873, and on divers other days and times between that day and the filing of the complaint, unlawfully did live together in a state- of open and notorious adultery, the said John D. Crowner being then and there, on the day aforesaid, a married man, and having then and there a lawful wife alive and in being, other than the said Nettie…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jenkins v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
- Searls v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
- State v. GartrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Dameron v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1844
- Shelton v. FordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1841
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. BurgdoerferSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Succession of LannesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Brevaldo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1886
- State v. McGeheeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
- State v. SekritSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.