Legal Opinion

Searls v. People

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1852PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Searls was convicted in the Lee Circuit Court, Wilkinson, Judge, presiding, of the crime of fornication. The trial was had at March term, 1852. The errors upon which the judgment is reversed are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Catón, J.

Searls and Amanda Hedley were indicted for living together in an open state of fornication. Searls alone was tried. On the trial, the court, at the request of the State’s attorney, gave to the jury the following instructions: “ That the offence with which the defendant is charged in this prosecution is legally and sufficiently proved by circumstances which raise the presumption of cohabitation and unlawful intimacy; that in order to constitute this offence, even one act of sexual intercourse need not be proved by positive testimony, but that the offence is sufficiently proved by any…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Jarrett v. JarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Luster v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
  3. Crane v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Miner v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Succession of LannesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API