Succession of Lannes
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Justice.
This is an action by a residuary legatee and an intervention by collateral heirs filed for the purpose of having reduced a testamentary disposition in favor of Emma Stevens, on the grounds that she had lived in open concubinage with the testator and, therefore, under the provisions of article 1481 of the Revised Civil Code, was not entitled to receive more than “one-tenth part of the whole value” of his estate, from the movable property. The plaintiff, as residuary legatee, also claimed that the legacy in his and Emma Stevens’ favor was a conjoint one, and that under the law…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sizeler v. SizelerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Succession of JahrausSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
- State v. MarvinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
- Jones v. KyleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
- Searls v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Heatwole v. StansburySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
- Gray v. GrayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- Thomas v. ThomasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- Manning v. HarrellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
- Succession of KeuhlingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.