Legal Opinion

Bischoff v. Dodson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1966No. 8461PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Judge.(1) This is an action for personal injuries sustained in the collision of two automobiles. Plaintiff had a verdict and judgment in the sum of $7,000.00; but, upon defendant’s motion, the trial court granted a new trial on the issue of damages only, basing its order upon the erroneous recep tion of evidence. The plaintiff has appealed from the order granting a new trial. The defendant, though maintaining the new trial was properly granted, questions the submissibility of the plaintiff’s case. In point of fact, the parties have briefed and argued a number of points, but we find it…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Moore v. Ready Mixed Concrete CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Lilly v. BoswellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. Kickham v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  4. Myers v. KarchmerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. Moss v. Mindlin's, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1957

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Weil v. SeltzerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  2. Chambers v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. Graham Ex Rel. Bodine v. ConnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Oventrop v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Metz v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API