Legal Opinion

Conway v. Emeny

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 31, 1953PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.

The attorney general instituted this action as the representative of the public interest in the protection of a testamentary trust intended for a public purpose. General Statutes § 212. The original defendants, each in the capacity of trustee, were eight individuals and the Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, hereinafter called the bank. The Pope-Brooks Foundation, to be called the foundation, was subsequently cited in as an additional party defendant. The plaintiff’s purpose in bringing the action was to obtain an injunction requiring the eight individual trustees to reopen Hill-Stead…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Wendt v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Mitchell v. ReevesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  4. City of Bridgeport v. ReillySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  5. Chase National Bank v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States Trust Co. v. BohartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement System v. Mayor of Baltimore CityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. In Re Charles M. Bair Family TrustMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. LymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  5. Palmer v. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1971

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API