Legal Opinion

Averill v. Lewis

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 5, 1927PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

The appeals from the Court of Probate are somewhat restricted in their recitals. The parties in argument and brief agree, however, upon certain facts which make them more readily understood, and which are as follows: The testatrices, Elizabeth J. Fitch and Mary L. Fitch, were sisters. Each left a will devising and bequeathing all the residue of her estate after the payment of debts and other proper charges, to her sister. “All the rest, residue and remainder of my estate; of whatever kind or nature and wheresoever situated, to my . . . sister ... to have and to hold the same unto her and her…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Ellert v. CogswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Beard's Appeal from County CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  3. Burbank v. BurbankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  4. Dalley v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  5. Adye v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. O'LEARY v. McGuinnessSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  2. Hooker v. Edes HomeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Bolster v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. Malcolm-SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  5. Blumenthal v. BarnesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API