Western Robidoux Printing & Lithographing Co. v. Missouri State Highway Commission
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
STOCKARD, Commissioner.
Plaintiff has appealed from the judgment of the circuit court dismissing its petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. At the time the notice of appeal was filed this court had appellate jurisdiction by reason of the amount in dispute, and jurisdiction is retained pursuant to Mo.Const. Art. V, § 31 (1945), as amended, V.A.M.S. We affirm.
We shall set forth in narrative form the allegations of the petition.
Plaintiff was the lessee of premises known as 208-214 Edmond Street, St. Joseph, Missouri, owned by Douglas Candy Company (hereinafter…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hamer v. State Highway Commission of the MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- State Ex Rel. McCaskill v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Bush v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority of Kansas City v. DunnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Ryan v. City of WarrensburgSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Seliga Shoe Stores, Inc. v. City of MaplewoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Weatherby Advertising Co. v. ConleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- Niemczyk v. BurlesonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Stephens v. DunnMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Modern Tractor & Supply Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.