Legal Opinion
Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority of Kansas City v. Dunn
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided July 10, 1967No. 52005PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONNELLY, Judge.
This is an action for apportionment of an award in condemnation. The Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority of Kansas City, Missouri, condemned the Royal Building in downtown Kansas City, Missouri. The date of taking was October IS, 1964. An award of $285,000 was entered for the entire building. Respondents are owners of the fee. Appellant Dunn claims a leasehold interest in the amount of $60,000. The dispute is between Dunn and the owners of the fee. A hearing was held and the trial court, without a jury, found Dunn does not have a compensable interest in the award.
We…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bales v. PerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Columbian Carbon Co. v. KightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
- Gibson v. ChouteauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
- Ott v. PickardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Goodwin v. Costello and ArelloMissouri Court of Appeals · 1948
3Cited by22 opinions
- Seliga Shoe Stores, Inc. v. City of MaplewoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Western Robidoux Printing & Lithographing Co. v. Missouri State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- St. Louis County National Bank v. Maryland Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Marriage of W.E.F. v. C.J.F.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Lytle v. PageMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.