Ginnett v. Greene
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for What-com county, Pemberton, J., entered May 11, 1914, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on a promissory note.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
This action was brought to recover upon a promissory note executed by George V. Wetzel and wife in favor of respondent and afterwards indorsed by appellant.
Appellant set up in his answer, and the question seems to have been tried out to the jury, that he was not to be bound by his indorsement of the note; that he had engaged as an attorney to assemble the assets of a business in which respondent and others were stockholders to pay the debts, and thereafter, if a surplus remained, to pay it to respondent and others to whom it belonged. There is testimony sufficient to sustain the finding of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pitt v. LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Baldwin v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Gilmore v. Skookum Box FactoryWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Dimmick v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Morris v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gannon v. BronstonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Hall v. Wichita State Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- McDonough v. Pacific Steamship Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
- National Association of Creditors v. MenishWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Hall v. Wichita State Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923