Legal Opinion

Moffett v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 29, 2002No. 00-8083PublishedCited by 262 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Douglas W. Moffett appeals from the dismissal with prejudice of his complaint alleging various ERISA and Wyoming state law violations by defendants Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., two Halliburton entities, and Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Moffett was employed by Halliburton as a cementer from 1989 to 1994. During this time, Halliburton maintained an Income Disability Plan, which was subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001, et. seq. Defendant Trustees of the Halliburton…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by262 opinions

  1. Re/Max, LLC v. Quicken Loans Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2018
  2. Callery v. United States Life Insurance Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  3. In Re Xcel Energy, Inc., Securities, Derivative & "ERISA" LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2004
  4. Kidneigh v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  5. Conover v. Aetna US Health Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003

257 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API