Legal Opinion
Footville State Bank v. Harvell
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided September 15, 1988No. 88-0347PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGartzke, P.J.
Morris Harvell appeals from an amended judgment entered after our remand in an earlier appeal. In the first appeal, we reinstated jury findings that credit card transactions between Morris and respondents Footville State Bank and Footville Agri-Service violated the Wisconsin Consumer Act (WCA), chs. 421-427, Stats., and the Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act (FCCPA), 15 U.S.C. sec. 1601 et seq. We remanded for the trial court to determine the effect of the reinstated findings.
On remand, the trial court awarded $1,000 to Morris for the violations, declined to award attorney fees to Morris…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Murray v. Holiday Rambler, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Donaldson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. DenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- First Wisconsin National Bank v. NicolaouWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. KrysheskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lindevig v. Dairy Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
- Chmill v. Friendly Ford-Mercury of Janesville, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- Radford v. J.J.B. Enterprises, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Burney v. Thorn Americas, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.