Legal Opinion
Expoconsul International, Inc. v. A/E Systems, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 13, 1989No. 88 Civ. 0877 (JMW)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WALKER, District Judge:
Defendant, A/E Systems Inc. (“A/E Systems”) has moved to dismiss the complaint in this action on the basis that venue is improper. Alternatively, the defendant seeks to have the matter transferred to the District of Connecticut on the theory of forum non conveniens. Finally, the defendant seeks to have either plaintiffs Sherman Act claims dismissed for failure to state a claim or to have plaintiff submit a more definite statement with respect to these claims. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion is denied in its entirety.
I. Background
A.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Federal Trade Commission v. Indiana Federation of DentistsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Continental Airlines, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1992
- Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
- Sunshine Cellular v. Vanguard Cellular Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Gross v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- United States v. Brown UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.