Legal Opinion

United States v. McKinnon Bridge Co., Inc.

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided May 20, 1981No. 81-30044PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WISEMAN, District Judge.

This case is before the Court to consider two defense motions. The first motion seeks dismissal of Count One of the Indictment, which alleges a violation of section one of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. The second motion attacks Counts Two through Six, which allege violations of the federal mail fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Both motions are denied.

Count One

Defendants argue that Count One should be dismissed because section one of the Sherman Act is unconstitutionally over-broad and vague. Contrary to the government’s facile assertion, Brief for United…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Ashland-Warren, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1982
  2. Bull Ex Rel. Bull v. Dardanelle Public School District 15District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1990
  3. Vandergriff v. City of ChattanoogaDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1998
  4. Harold Lovelace, D/B/A The Last Chance Club v. City of KnoxvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API