United States v. Ashland-Warren, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WISEMAN, District Judge.
This Memorandum addresses the motion of defendants Ashland-Warren and Ashland Oil to dismiss these indictments on double jeopardy grounds, or in the alternative, to require an election of counts. Each indictment alleges a violation of section one of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § l. 1 Defendants argue that Ashland-Warren’s prior convictions in the Eastern District of Virginia on three section one charges bar these prosecutions, because they are all based on a single conspiracy. For the reasons set forth in this Memorandum, the Court denies the motion. The…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Zachair, Ltd. v. DriggsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
- United States v. Mmr Corporation (La) and James B. RutlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Beachner Const. Co., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1983
- United States v. Bernard D. ReicherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- AGI-Bluff Manor, Inc. v. ReagenDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.