Legal Opinion

United States v. Ashland-Warren, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided March 16, 1982No. 81-30033, 81-30037, 81-30038, 81-30042 and 81-30043PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WISEMAN, District Judge.

This Memorandum addresses the motion of defendants Ashland-Warren and Ashland Oil to dismiss these indictments on double jeopardy grounds, or in the alternative, to require an election of counts. Each indictment alleges a violation of section one of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § l. 1 Defendants argue that Ashland-Warren’s prior convictions in the Eastern District of Virginia on three section one charges bar these prosecutions, because they are all based on a single conspiracy. For the reasons set forth in this Memorandum, the Court denies the motion. The…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Zachair, Ltd. v. DriggsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
  2. United States v. Mmr Corporation (La) and James B. RutlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Beachner Const. Co., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1983
  4. United States v. Bernard D. ReicherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. AGI-Bluff Manor, Inc. v. ReagenDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API