Legal Opinion

Jaffray v. Hill

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 29, 1963No. Gen. 48,845PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schwartz

Plaintiff brought suit against defendants Robert Hill and Donald Sealy, charging assault and battery, and against defendant Essex Liquors, Inc. (Essex), under the Dram Shop Act (Ill Rev Stats, c 43, § 135 (1961)). The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff and against the three defendants in the sum of $5500. Each defendant filed a post-trial motion, seeking judgment non obstante veredicto (n.o.v.), or in the alternative, a new trial. The court denied the motion of Donald Sealy for judgment n.o.v. and also denied his motion for a new trial. Sealy has not appealed. The court granted the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The People v. RybkaIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. The PEOPLE v. ThickstenIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Christensen v. FranklandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944
  4. Thomas v. DoorleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Eli Lilly & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  2. Sklan v. SmollaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API