Legal Opinion

Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. Nunnery

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1936No. 31967PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, O'. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellee secured a judgment against the appellant on a life insurance policy of one thousand dollars, issued by the appellant to the appellee’s husband, Lane Nunnery, in which she was the beneficiary. The policy contained a double indemnity clause; and there was a verdict and judgment for two^ thousand dollars.

The appellant requested, but was refused, a directed verdict as to its liability at all, and as to its liability on the double indemnity clause. In support of its contention that a general verdict should have been directed for it, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. New York Mutual Life Insurance v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Alabama v. MontagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Northwestern Life Insurance v. Muskegon BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Meister v. General Accident Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1919
  5. White v. HarriganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. GODFREY v. Huntington Lumber & Supply CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Johnson v. BrewerMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Pellerin v. Cashway Pharmacy of Franklin, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. McGee v. ClarkMississippi Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Wylie v. Union Casualty & Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API