Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Town of Ahoskie

Was there sufficient evidence to be submitted to the jury to sustain the issues above set forth? We think not. This case was here before: R. R. v. Ahoskie, 192 N. C., 258.

In Efird v. Winston-Salem, 199 N. C., at p. 37, is the following: “In R. R. v. Ahoskie, supra, there was a dispute of fact as to whether the land was a public street or the property of the railroad. The railroad submitted itself to the assessment procedure, protested to the work being done as the property belonged to it and not to the town of Ahoskie, and appealed under C. S., 2714, from the confirmation. The Court said, at…