Legal Opinion

Rushing v. Aldridge

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 2, 2011No. COA10-1059PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

This appeal arises out of an action for adverse possession brought by plaintiffs Keith Rushing and Hazel S. Rushing against defendants Clegg Aldridge and Eva E. Aldridge. The Aldridges appeal from the trial court’s compulsory order of reference, the order denying their motion for summary judgment and confirming the report of the referee, and the order granting partial summary judgment to the Rushings.

During the proceedings below, the trial court determined that the case involved a complicated boundary issue and that a personal view of the property might be required. The court,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jones v. . BeamanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Dulin Ex Rel. Dulin v. FairesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Merrick v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Brown v. E. H. Clement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mitchell, Brewer, Richardson, Adams, Burge & Boughman v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  2. Minor v. MinorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. North Carolina ex rel. North Carolina Department of Administration v. Alcoa Power Generating, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API