Legal Opinion
Waldemar P. Thomson v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 18, 1966No. 206-61PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge: *
Plaintiff claims $7,125 for land appraisal services he asserts were ordered by the United States under an alleged contract. The basic issue is whether the Government, at any time, contracted for these services, and bound itself to pay the plaintiff.
In 1959, the United States Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles 1 was charged with litigating two condemnation cases (C.A. Nos. 1836-ND and 1904-ND) brought to acquire land for the United States Naval Air Station at Leemore, California. An expert was needed to appraise certain of the land and property rights. Plaintiff, an experienced…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Clews v. JamiesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Ralston Steel Corporation, Assignee of Morgan Manufacturing Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Russell Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Porter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Thompson Ramo Wooldridge Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Luther P. Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.