Legal Opinion

Walden v. S. M. Whitney Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 4, 1946No. 15430PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) A motion was filed in this court by Whitney Company to dismiss the writ of error, on the ground that M. C. Barwick, one of the original defendants in the trial court, and a defendant in error when the case was previously before the Supreme Court, is not named a defendant in error, and that Barwick is interested in sustaining the judgment taxing costs against Mrs. Walden, since any judgment for costs in favor of Mrs. Walden would be a charge against both of the original defendants in error.

There is no merit in the motion to dismiss the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. VaughnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Mendenhall v. StovallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Hicks v. Atlanta Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Hamilton v. DuPreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. Sangster v. Toledo Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Woodside v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  2. Pye v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API