Sangster v. Toledo Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
At common law insane persons were the particular and peculiar wards of equity. Conway v. Robinson, -Mo.-, 178 S. W. 154. From earliest times imbeciles have been regarded as wards of the chancellor. Upton’s Commit tee v. Bush, 135 Ky. 102 (121 S. W. 1005). See also Buswell’s Law of Insanitj’’, § 35. Courts of general equity jurisdiction within the limits prescribed by the statutory law of the forum, if there be any such law on the subject, have general supervisory authority and jurisdiction of the persons as well as the property of all citizens who are under any legal…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Richards v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Howard v. BarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
- McGowan v. LufburrowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Copelan v. KimbroughSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- Sharp v. FindleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Helton v. CrawleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Georgia Veneer & Package Co. v. Florida National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Phillips v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Orr v. OrrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Dooley v. ScogginsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.