Legal Opinion

Seattle, Port Angeles & Lake Crescent Railway v. Land

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1914No. 11760PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal by defendants from a judgment of the superior court for Clallam county, Ralston, J., entered July 81, 1913, awarding damages in condemnation proceedings, after a trial to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

— This is an appeal by the landowners from an award in condemnation. To avoid confusion, the parties will be designated throughout the condemnees as appellants and the condemner as respondent. The respondent sought to take a strip, of land one hundred feet wide, containing 2.79 acres, for a railroad right of way through forty acres of land, in Clallam county, belonging to the appellants. The land was practically unimproved. Topographically, it is divided into two parts wholly unlike in character. Approximately, the east half is low bottom land cut up by overflow channels of Morse’s creek. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Providence & Worcester Railroad v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  3. Western American Co. v. St. Ann Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Louisville, New Orleans & Texas Railroad v. RyanMississippi Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Calumet River Railway Co. v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wrightsman v. Southwestern Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. State v. MOTTMAN MERC. CO., INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Finch v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. State ex rel. Grays Harbor Logging Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API