Smith v. Dolan
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BIEGELMEIER, Judge.
Plaintiff's action to partition real estate under SDCL 21-45 gave rise to this controversy. William H. Smith was the owner of 160 acres of land in Brookings County on the date of his death *423in 1933. In conformity with the terms of his will the county court entered a Decree of Distribution which distributed the land as follows:
"To John H. Smith * * * for his use and benefit during his life time, viz:
(here follows the legal description of the 160 acres and a tract in North Dakota)
the said John H. Smith and his wife to have the use and benefit of said real estate during their…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McConnell v. DoolittleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- In Re Estate of HartsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- In re Estate of WinterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Burton v. KinneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
- Metzgar EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rowett v. McFarlandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Smith v. DolanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972