Legal Opinion

Smith v. Dolan

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1972No. 10967-aPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIEGELMEIER, Judge.

Plaintiff's action to partition real estate under SDCL 21-45 gave rise to this controversy. William H. Smith was the owner of 160 acres of land in Brookings County on the date of his death *423in 1933. In conformity with the terms of his will the county court entered a Decree of Distribution which distributed the land as follows:

"To John H. Smith * * * for his use and benefit during his life time, viz:

(here follows the legal description of the 160 acres and a tract in North Dakota)

the said John H. Smith and his wife to have the use and benefit of said real estate during their…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McConnell v. DoolittleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. In Re Estate of HartsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. In re Estate of WinterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Burton v. KinneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Metzgar EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rowett v. McFarlandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Smith v. DolanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API