Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Hartson

California Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1933No. Docket No. Sac. 4759PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

This in an appeal from an order denying appellants’ protests to the eighteenth account of the trustee under the will of Electa B. Hartson, and from an order approving the account of said trustee. The facts giving rise to the controversy are as follows:

In the year 1902 Electa B. Hartson died testate in the city of Napa, California. Her will was duly admitted to probate and the final decree of distribution made and entered in 1903. By the decree of distribution it was directed in conformance with the provisions of the will, that certain property should be held in trust, and that the income…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Lowry v. Common Council of City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Church Home for Children of Protestant Episcopal Church v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Estate of NorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API