Logan v. Logan
Supreme Court of Georgia
1DissentAlmand, Justice
When the plaintiffs instituted this action they named Kathleen Logan Phillips, as executrix of the estate of Lula K. Logan, a party defendant. The primary purpose of this action was two fold: (1) to require the specific performance by the executrix of an oral contract by the testatrix as to the devising of certain real and personal property to the plaintiffs and (2) • the cancellation of a deed from the testatrix to one of the defendants. In both instances, the executrix of the estate was a necessary and indispensable party. Hazelrigs v. Butler, 204 Ga. 98 (48 SE2d 727); Reeves v. Tarnok, 161…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sowell v. SowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Southern Railway Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Simpson v. BrockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Pearson v. CoursonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Reeves v. TarnokSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.