Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Brock

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 11, 1901PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Motion to reinstate case. Before Judge Janes. Haralson superior court. June 14, 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.

The case of Brock against Simpson came on to be heard in the superior court of Haralson county, was dismissed, and, during the same term, over the defendant’s objection, reinstated. The motion to reinstate was based on the grounds that the case was called out of its order for trial, that the plaintiff, for reasons assigned, was unavoidably absent, and that because of his absence his counsel was unable to prove certain facts essential to the maintenance of his action. It affirmatively appears, however, that the case was dismissed “ on motion of plaintiff’s counsel.” It is inferable that…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ezzard v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Petty v. Piedmont Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. Bowman v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  5. McDonnell v. WasenmillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API