Legal Opinion

Frontier Companies of Alaska, Inc. v. Jack White Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1991No. S-3800, S-3801PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

INTRODUCTION

At issue is the effect to be given a real estate broker’s exclusive listing agreement when the sale was not formally completed until after the agreement had expired. We have been asked to review the denial of directed verdicts regarding when the sale occurred, whether the seller acted in bad faith, and whether the buyer induced a breach of the listing agreement. The buyer and seller also claim error in the trial proceedings. Specifically, we must determine whether a settlement agreement was improperly discussed before the jury, and whether the trial court…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Poulin v. ZartmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Knight v. American Guard & Alert, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Corinthian Corp. v. White & Bollard, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Covino v. PfefferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kava v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Brigdon v. LambAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Colonial Ins. Co. of California v. TumblesonDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1995
  4. Brigdon v. LambAlaska Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API