Frontier Companies of Alaska, Inc. v. Jack White Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
INTRODUCTION
At issue is the effect to be given a real estate broker’s exclusive listing agreement when the sale was not formally completed until after the agreement had expired. We have been asked to review the denial of directed verdicts regarding when the sale occurred, whether the seller acted in bad faith, and whether the buyer induced a breach of the listing agreement. The buyer and seller also claim error in the trial proceedings. Specifically, we must determine whether a settlement agreement was improperly discussed before the jury, and whether the trial court…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Poulin v. ZartmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Knight v. American Guard & Alert, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Corinthian Corp. v. White & Bollard, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
- Covino v. PfefferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kava v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Brigdon v. LambAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Colonial Ins. Co. of California v. TumblesonDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1995
- Brigdon v. LambAlaska Supreme Court · 1997