Legal Opinion
Kinnan v. Sitka Counseling
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided April 17, 2015No. 6998 S-15437PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOLGER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Arthur J. Kinnan lived in a three-bedroom residence as part of a substance abuse treatment program operated by Sitka Counseling. Funding for that program ended, and Sitka Counseling informed Kinnan that he would be required to vacate the residence. Kinnan filed suit against Sitka Counseling and two of its staff members, alleging several torts based on the defendants' conduct when removing him from the premises, violations of Alaska's Landlord Tenant Act, and deprivation of. constitutional rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After a bench trial, the superior…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bigley v. Alaska Psychiatric InstituteAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- David S. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Lewis v. LewisAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Sykes v. Melba Creek Mining, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
- D.J. v. P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wagner v. WagnerAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Downs v. DownsAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Sarah A. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Sherrill v. SherrillAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Cynthia Aiken Janet Carter and Regional Alcohol and Drug Abuse Counselor Training Program v. Alaska Addiction Professionals Association NAADAC, the Association for Addiction Professionals Diane Ogilvie and Akeela, Inc., Alaska Addiction Professionals Association NAADAC, the Association for Addiction Professionals Diane Ogilvie and Akeela, Inc. v. Cynthia Aiken Janet Carter and Regional Alcohol and Drug Abuse Counselor Training ProgramAlaska Supreme Court · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.