Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Borough of Haines

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 2019No. Supreme Court No. S-16991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BOLGER, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

An individual brought civil claims against the prosecutors who secured his convictions for assault and resisting arrest, alleging that they committed various torts and violated his constitutional right to due process. The superior court dismissed his state and federal claims, concluding that the prosecutors enjoyed absolute immunity. We agree that the prosecutors are protected by absolute immunity from both the state and federal claims because they were acting in their official capacity as advocates for the State when they committed the acts that gave rise…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Burns v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Van de Kamp v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. City & Borough of Juneau v. ThibodeauAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Alaska, Department of Health & Social Services v. Planned Parenthood of the Great NorthwestAlaska Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API