Legal Opinion
Croxton v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 21, 1939No. 28863PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON J.
This is an appeal from an order of the Corporation Commission entered in connection with its administration of the provisions of article 1, ch. 59, of the Session Laws of 1935, which is commonly known as “the well-spacing act,” and deals with the drilling of wells into a single pool or common source of supply.
The area defined by said order as overlying a common source of supply designated therein as “the Noble Pool” consists of twelve entire sections of land in Cleveland and McClain counties.
The hearing which resulted in the order was had upon the application of one W. A. Delaney,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
- Lombardo v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Shaw v. GrumbineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Patterson v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Palmer Oil Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Bernstein v. SmutzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- HALL v. GALMORSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Anderson v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Jack Lincoln Shops, Inc. v. State Dry Cleaners' BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.