Legal Opinion

Dimmitt v. State Ex Rel. Milburn

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1925No. 18967PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

The sole question for determination is whether a suit can be maintained upon a supersedeas bond under the circumstances of this case to compel the payment of the judgment in the original bastardy proceeding to the amount of the penalty of the bond. The petition fully pleads the bond, its execution and breach, and the answer admits the execution of the bond and the affirmation of the judgment in the Court of Appeals, and pleads by way of new matter that, after the affirmance of the judgment in the Court of Appeals, Dimmitt surrendered himself and was committed to the county jail of Grreene…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bulkley v. StephensOhio Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. AmannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. State v. SchwartzOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State ex rel. Simons v. KiserOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. State ex rel. Gill v. VolzOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  5. State, Ex Rel. McCloskey v. McCloskeyOhio Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API