State ex rel. Gill v. Volz
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The accused, appellant herein, claims that since the statutory definition of a civil action is limited by Sections 11237 and 11238, General Code, to proceedings in a court-of justice involving process, pleadings, and a judgment or decree for redress or the enforcement of a legal right (Missionary Society of M. E. Church v. Ely, 56 Ohio St., 405, 407, 47 N. E., 537), a bastardy proceeding may not qualify as a civil action in which a verdict may be rendered upon the concurrence of only three-fourths or more of the-members of the jury. The accused bases this contention on a construction of a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Belding v. State Ex Rel. HeifnerOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. BrunetteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- State v. JeffreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- State ex rel. Patterson v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Duncan v. State Ex Rel. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.