Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Gill v. Volz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1951No. 32456Published

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The accused, appellant herein, claims that since the statutory definition of a civil action is limited by Sections 11237 and 11238, General Code, to proceedings in a court-of justice involving process, pleadings, and a judgment or decree for redress or the enforcement of a legal right (Missionary Society of M. E. Church v. Ely, 56 Ohio St., 405, 407, 47 N. E., 537), a bastardy proceeding may not qualify as a civil action in which a verdict may be rendered upon the concurrence of only three-fourths or more of the-members of the jury. The accused bases this contention on a construction of a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Belding v. State Ex Rel. HeifnerOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State v. BrunetteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State v. JeffreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  4. State ex rel. Patterson v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Duncan v. State Ex Rel. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API