United States v. Joseph Shea Peeples
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Joseph Shea Peeples contends that the district court erred in dismissing without prejudice a prior indictment against him. He was subsequently reindicted and convicted on all counts. Peeples argues that the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161-3174, requires that the prior indictment be dismissed with prejudice. Finding no abuse of discretion by the district court in dismissing without prejudice, we affirm the judgments of conviction.
I
Peeples was indicted on three counts of wire fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud. His two codefendants were indicted on a number of related…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. RushCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- United States v. William Bull Pringle, Iii, United States of America v. James Crawford McAfee United States of America v. Lloyd Cowan ParkerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Carl Henry HowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Mildred CarrasquilloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Joseph John RussoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. John O. Green A/K/A John O. HornungCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. James L. Kington and Don EarneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Alvin August KramerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Daniel Lee SaltzmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. James MayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.