Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel Lee Saltzman
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 22, 1993No. 92-1019PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
The Government appeals the district court’s sua sponte dismissal with prejudice of the information filed against Daniel Lee Saltzman. The district court concluded the seven-month time period between Saltz-man’s arrest and filing of the information constituted a violation of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161-3174 (1985). The issues presented are whether the delay in charging the Defendant mandates dismissal, and whether dismissal with prejudice is the appropriate remedy.
I
On March 14, 1991, Daniel Lee Saltzman obtained one liter of phenyl-2-propanone (P2P) 1 from an…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. William Bull Pringle, Iii, United States of America v. James Crawford McAfee United States of America v. Lloyd Cowan ParkerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Peter NooneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- United States v. Thomas GambinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Lupe GomezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Santiago-BecerrilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Frank James Occhipinti, Jr., Austin Michael Suttles, Timothy James Spence, Tina Marie SwabCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Abdush-ShakurCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.