Legal Opinion

United States v. James L. Kington and Don Earney

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 14, 1989No. 88-1408PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

James L. Kington and Don Earney appeal from convictions for misapplying bank funds, making false entries in bank records, causing a bank to fail to file a Currency Transaction Report, and, in King-ton’s case, filing a false tax return. King-ton and Earney contend that the jury instructions on the misapplication counts incorrectly stated the specific intent element of the crime; that there was insufficient evidence to support conviction on any count; and that they were not tried within the time limits prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act. We reverse the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. United States v. PaceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Shukri BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. WhitfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. Thomas GambinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Barbara ChaneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API