Legal Opinion
Hull v. Freedman
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 2, 1964No. 16548PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANGDON, Justice.
On November 5, 1959, appellees instituted suit to recover excess payments made under an oil and gas lease. The reservation of the overriding royalty interest contained in the lease under which the payments were made provides in part as follows:
“When the oil produced hereunder from the depths below two-thousand (2,000) feet shall amount to an average of thirty (30) barrels or more per well per day, the overriding royalty shall be a net one eighth (Véth) of the total oil so produced under this assignment, same to be free and clear of all operating costs and expenses; and when…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cowart v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Gulf Oil Corporation v. Lone Star Producing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Shaw v. BushCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Sunray Enterprises, Inc. v. RosenaurCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
3Cited by42 opinions
- Belford Trucking Co. v. ZagarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- Crenshaw v. SwensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Bryan v. Citizens National Bank in AbileneTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Whitaker v. Bank of El Paso, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.