Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Oosting
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided February 2, 1965No. Civ. A. 4521PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALTER E. HOFFMAN, Chief Judge.
Following the entry of an order denying compensation to petitioner under the Longshoremen’s and Haxbor Workers' Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 901 et seq., for lack of jurisdiction in that petitionex-’s injury of December 19, 1961, did not occur upon the navigable waters of the United States, petitioner seasonably filed his complaint requesting (1) a trial de novo on the jurisdictional issue, and (2) the suspension and vacation of the alleged erroneous order as entered by the respondent Deputy Commissioner.
There is no factual dispute as to the details of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Reed v. the YakaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bernard Harney v. William M. Moore Building Corporation and Lopier Construction CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- East v. OostingDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1965
- Peter v. ArrienDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Creel v. the Drill Tender Jack CleverlyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1966
- Johnson v. Noble Drilling CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1966
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.